Ballots and balances<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n South Africa\u2019s recent transition to multiparty coalition governance, Namibia\u2019s historic election of a female President and the creation of a gender-balanced Cabinet, and the peaceful transfer of power following Botswana\u2019s elections were all responded with great recognition during the academy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n However, not all was cause for celebration. Southern Africa\u2019s elections also exposed systemic challenges: inadequate voter education, electoral material shortage, diaspora voting barriers, pervasive influence of social media and the proliferation of information disorders, electoral violence, the “over-judicialisation” of elections \u2014 a high number of court cases to resolve election-related issues taking place close to the election day itself, which can delay the process and disrupt practical planning and organisation \u2014 low participation rates among youth and marginalised groups and a trust deficit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trust, trust, trust\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n This isn’t a Megadeth song, but the word \u2018Trust\u2019 echoed louder in the Radisson Hotel\u2014where the academy took place\u2014than at any of their concerts, you can be sure of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trust deficit became the defining feature of the electoral climate across Southern Africa, as speaker after speaker pointed to it as a major concern. The consequences extend well beyond voter apathy, showing a strong correlation with the concerning trend of declining voter turnout, as noted by Simelane Nkanyiso, representative of the European Union Delegation in South Africa. In fact, Professor Everisto Benyera from the University of South Africa went even further, predicting that voter turnout in South Africa could drop from 37% to just 10% within the next 15 years if current patterns persist, while Professor Khabele Maltosa, author of the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (ACDEG), emphasised the need to significantly increase investment directed towards bolstering electoral integrity in order to address voter participation concerns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n New horizons <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The way out of the prospect of such a democratic deficit could be a (1) a shift towards a developmental democracy that addresses core survival issues and reflects citizens\u2019 socio-economic needs, as highlighted by Professor Khabele Matlosa; (2) leveraging the public\u2019s trust in religious leaders; and (3) reaffirming to the following six broad commitments, as highlighted by National Democratic Institute Director of Elections Richard Klein:<\/p>\n\n\n\n These commitments aim to address what Felix Kafuuma, Programmes Manager at the African Election Observers Network (AfEONet)<\/a>, harshly described as the ‘four cancer cells’ of electoral integrity: money, manipulation, institutional weakness, and intimidation and violence. The Southern African 2024 Elections Compendium of Recommendations<\/a> strongly embraces these six commitments and was officially launched during the Election Academy. The recommendations put forward are context-specific – it was accentuated during the academy that equality in election results amongst countries does not necessarily reflect equality in their post-election conditions – and were formed based on the findings from ESN-SA\u2019s 2024 Election Observation Missions in South Africa<\/a>, Mozambique<\/a>, Botswana<\/a> and Namibia<\/a> supported by AHEAD Africa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
![\"Southern](\"https:\/\/ahead.africa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Southern-African-2024-Elections-Compendium-of-Recommendations-1024x723.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"Election](\"https:\/\/ahead.africa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Election-Observation-Manual-723x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n